Prediction of Cem Ilkel [578th] vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras [865th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
L W W L W W W L L LHead To Head: Ilkel 1 - 1 Menendez-Maceiras
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Menendez-Maceiras winning 3. The last match between Ilkel and Menendez-Maceiras was at the Pozoblanco Challenger, 18-07-2023, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | 1 |
| Ilkel | Stats | Menendez-Maceiras |
|---|---|---|
| 80% (24-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 578 | Ranking | 865 |
| 144 | Highest Rank | 111 |
| 29 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 13 |
| 57% (432-332) | Career Total W/L | 55% (608-500) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $504,829 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Ilkel VS Menendez-Maceiras H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
40%
(
21 of
52)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Ilkel VS Menendez-Maceiras H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 21 | Games Won | 29 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:13:46 | Average Match Time | 2:13:46 |
| 48% (83/173) | 1st Serve % | 57% (85/149) |
| 71% (59/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (60/85) |
| 49% (44/90) | 2nd Serve Win % | 66% (42/64) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (8/20) |
| 32% (47/149) | Return Points Win % | 40% (70/173) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cem Ilkel vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 1 Menendez-Maceiras
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 45.51% of points on their second serve, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 40.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.41% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 282/ 176), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.27% of matches (W/L 26/ 11), where as Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times and Menendez-Maceiras being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Menendez-Maceiras winning 3. The last match between Ilkel and Menendez-Maceiras was at the Pozoblanco Challenger, 18-07-2023, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Menendez-Maceiras have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Menendez-Maceiras 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Menendez-Maceiras 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.6 while Menendez-Maceiras has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matyas Fuele
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mikal Statham
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
7 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ilkel vs Menendez-Maceiras?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ilkel Vs Menendez-Maceiras is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (432/332) | Win/Loss | 55% (608/500) |
| 55% (965/800) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1386/1213) |
| 52% (8656/8131) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (12784/12211) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2802 | Aces Total | 2854 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1373 | Total Double Faults | 1317 |
| 1:14:33 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 532.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 579.89 |
| 58% (23627/40473) | 1st Serve % | 61% (28852/47333) |
| 70% (16617/23627) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (20129/28852) |
| 51% (8584/16846) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9465/18481) |
| 40% (1602/3959) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1750/4361) |
| 39% (15947/40945) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18132/47633) |
| 56% (420/745) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (587/1078) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 54% (144/269) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (212/417) |
| 56% (127/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (201/381) |
| 85% (420/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (578/479) |
| 14% (420/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (578/98) |
| 21% (343/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (529/124) |
See recent tennis photos of Ilkel and Menendez-Maceiras
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
